How Much Does Polsia AI Cost in 2026? Pricing Breakdown

You sign up expecting a normal SaaS invoice. Then you hit the fine print.

Polsia's own Product Hunt launch post lists the base plan at $49 a month. That number alone puts it in line with most solo-founder AI tools on the market right now. The catch shows up once you read past the launch page: both Superapp's breakdown and Preuve AI's review flag a 20% revenue-share stacked on top of that subscription, applied to revenue Polsia's agents get credited with generating for the business.

That's a structurally different pricing model than a flat fee. A $49/mo tool that takes a fifth of your upside is cheap for someone testing the waters. It gets expensive fast for someone actually making money through it. Stork.AI's review frames the base plan as a freemium entry point, with the real cost only showing up once revenue does.

Run the math on a founder doing $8,000/mo in Polsia-attributed activity. Twenty percent of that is $1,600, on top of the $49 base. At that revenue level you're paying more for Polsia than most solo teams pay for a CRM and an outbound tool combined.

The Preuve AI review raises a harder problem than price: attribution. If an agent touches a deal but a human closes it, whose revenue counts toward the 20%? The review calls this a validation gap rather than a hypothetical, because revenue-share pricing only works if the attribution logic is transparent and auditable.

None of the public reviews surveyed here cite a published, itemized attribution policy from Polsia. That's worth pressing on before you connect billing, not after.

Stedral runs the opposite structure: a flat monthly subscription with no revenue-share layered in, across a permanently free Origin plan and three paid tiers above it. Check the current numbers on the pricing page directly rather than trust a training-data snapshot, since these figures move.

Where Polsia bills on outcomes, Stedral's Approvals inbox puts a human decision in front of every agent-proposed spend or outbound message before it goes out. There's no revenue to attribute because nothing ships without a yes first. That's a design choice, not a pricing trick: it shifts risk back to the operator instead of the vendor.

The trade-off cuts both ways, and this is the honest part. A revenue-share model like Polsia's means you pay close to nothing in a slow month. Stedral's flat fee bills the same whether your agents landed a client or sat idle. If you're pre-revenue and want cost to track traction directly, that's a real point in Polsia's favor.

Get three answers in writing before you connect a card: how revenue gets attributed to Polsia's agents versus your own team's work, whether the 20% applies to gross or net revenue, and what happens to that obligation if you cancel mid-cycle.

Superapp's review cites Trustpilot data that paints a mixed picture, not a uniformly bad one. Read the actual complaint threads instead of the star average. Pattern-match the specific failure mode people describe, not just the score.